In accordance with art. 9 of Act 270 to 21 December 2005, were "appointed" 110 tellers for the 28 polling stations of the upcoming municipal elections.
is appointed because the current Italian electoral law, written by Minister Roberto Calderoni and defined in the same interview, "a slut" and then be called by the political scientist Giovanni Sartori porcellum, this provides for rescinding the "draw" method used until then. Although the law did not prevent
and does not prevent, in full independence of election commissions, to continue using the old method.
The idea behind this change was the desire to ensure fair resolution of the polling stations to protect majority and opposition. Some also sought to give, to justify the unjustifiable, even a further aspect of the "noble", trying to give a social value, and explained that the nomination would have favored special disadvantaged categories. But the use
that usually if they have done has been inspired by these principles of fairness, security and social value?
Since 2005, throughout Italy, in every election, the issue has jumped into the public and many have proposed the return to the drawing, to be done even if only among the poor who fall into those categories would facilitate rightly (unemployed, students and those on low incomes), highlighting the risk of misuse of the instrument and method based on the "appointing authority". A
Galatina has not seen fit to maintain the system by drawing lots. All according to the law, no legal objection, but let us demonstrate the unfortunate discomfort of certain behaviors.
focused starting point by giving a name to the existing components of the Electoral Commission which is expected to be composed of a President, in the person of the mayor or, as in our case, the Prefectural Commissioner, and advisers representing a guarantee of all, majority and opposition, then in addition to HE Dr. Campbell, who chairs, the Commission is now composed of former directors Guido, complaining and Coluccia.
We have every confidence in people and we do not doubt that in any way 'to make the appointment criteria and parameters were used to examine only the possible conditions of difficulty of the candidates, then surely you will not be given the names of the candidates or any political sponsorship and do not imagine that anyone could even think of using such appointments to help relatives, friends, sympathizers of his political party or just to create consensus.
However, even in a spirit of great confidence, we can not raise a few objections: why not make
public the criteria used for decisions, ensuring that the work of the Commission has actually complied with the spirit of general protection that the law required?
was appropriate that a candidate for mayor was part of this Commission "appointed"?
was appropriate for a resigning the former majority which has actively contributed to the fall of the previous administration and that, by not resubmitted as a candidate in any capacity, today it is not clear which part to secure political act, part of the Commission "registered"?
No, for us it was at least inappropriate and members of the Electoral Commission would had to unanimously decide to make the selection of the scrutineers as openly as possible, by drawing public or alternatively resign.
reiterate, nothing legally significant, but we want to highlight the "method" to a policy devoid of sensitivity, more and more arrogant and indifferent to the collateral requirements demanded that the case in respect of all Galatina, even those of the other party.
Galatina Moving
0 comments:
Post a Comment